UBS questions White House claims on $20T foreign investment

Summary

President Trump recently announced that more than $20 trillion in foreign investment has flowed into the United States during his second term, asserting that this figure could reach $25 trillion by the end of his term. However, UBS economist Arend Kapteyn has questioned this narrative, noting that new foreign direct investment (FDI) totaled only $232 billion in 2025, which is significantly below the 10-year average and lower in real terms than any pre-pandemic year. Kapteyn highlighted that a staggering 94% of this investment consisted of acquisitions of existing US firms rather than the creation of new businesses, indicating that foreign capital is primarily reallocating ownership rather than contributing to the growth of new productive capacity in the US.

Analysis

UBS: UBS is a leading global financial institution providing investment banking, wealth management, and research services. Its economist Arend Kapteyn recently published analysis comparing announced foreign investment figures with official Bureau of Economic Analysis data on actual new foreign direct investment flows into the United States. White House: The White House is the executive office of the President of the United States, currently led by Donald Trump in his second term. It maintains a tracker highlighting trillions in announced domestic and foreign investment commitments from countries including the UAE, Qatar, Japan, Saudi Arabia, India, and South Korea as evidence of an emerging manufacturing revival. Donald Trump: Donald Trump serves as President of the United States. He has publicly stated that foreign investment inflows to the US have reached unprecedented levels during his current term, far exceeding any prior country experience. Arend Kapteyn: Arend Kapteyn is an economist at UBS who authored a recent note examining foreign direct investment trends. His analysis points to discrepancies between high-profile investment announcements and measured new FDI, emphasizing that most activity involves acquisitions rather than new productive capacity. Data Timing: A lag often exists between high-level investment pledges and their appearance in official spending data from sources like the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Sector Drivers: Recent foreign direct investment shows modest activity concentrated in areas such as media and telecoms as well as primary metals, without evidence of a broad manufacturing surge. FDI Composition: Most new foreign investment activity consists of acquisitions of existing US firms rather than the creation of new businesses or expansions of foreign-owned operations.

Categories

politicsmacro
View Original Tweet