CNN, MS NOW, Politico seek court order to maintain White House access
by@Reuters
Summary
CNN, MS NOW, and Politico have requested a federal judge to issue a court order to maintain their White House access while they contest President Donald Trump's decision to ban them based on coverage he finds unfavorable. This move follows their September 21 lawsuit, which argues that the bans constitute unlawful viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment. A federal judge, Timothy Kelly, had previously issued a 14-day temporary restraining order against the bans, suggesting they likely infringe upon the outlets' rights. The Justice Department defends Trump's actions, claiming the bans were lawful as they were aimed at protecting national security due to concerns over classified information being disclosed.
Analysis
CNN: CNN is a major American news network that provides coverage of politics, international affairs, and current events. In this news, it is one of the outlets seeking a preliminary injunction to maintain White House access while challenging President Trump's ban over disputed coverage. MS NOW: MS NOW is a cable news channel focused on political analysis and breaking news. In this news, it is one of the three outlets petitioning a federal judge to extend protections against the White House ban initiated due to coverage President Trump dislikes. Politico: Politico is a digital news organization specializing in politics and policy reporting. In this news, it joins CNN and MS NOW in filing for a court order to preserve its White House credentials during litigation against the administration's access restrictions. Jack Queen: Jack Queen is a Reuters reporter based in New York who covers legal and media stories. In this news, he is credited with reporting on the outlets' request for injunctive relief in their ongoing case against the White House. Daniel Wallis: Daniel Wallis is a Reuters editor handling international and U.S. news content. In this news, he is credited with editing the report on the media outlets' legal challenge to the presidential access bans. Justice Department: The Justice Department represents the executive branch in federal litigation. In this news, it is defending the administration's position that the bans were lawful actions taken for national security reasons related to classified information. US District Judge Timothy Kelly: US District Judge Timothy Kelly presides over federal cases in Washington, DC. In this news, he previously issued a temporary restraining order blocking the White House bans after determining they likely violated the outlets' due process rights, and is now considering a longer injunction. Lawsuit Filing: The outlets filed their lawsuit on September 21 claiming the bans amount to unlawful viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment. Court Proceedings: A federal judge in Washington, DC is overseeing the case and previously granted a short-term order blocking the bans pending further review. Administration Position: The Justice Department maintains that the president acted lawfully to protect national security after determining the coverage revealed classified details.
Categories
macro